Ideally your Hoon works perfectly the first time. But...
When you get a syntax error, you'll see a message like
syntax error: 10 12
This is a line and column number; more exactly, the line and column of the first byte the parser couldn't interpret as part of a correct Hoon file. These values are always correct.
Usually, the line and column tell you everything you need to
know. But the worst-case scenario for a syntax error is that,
somewhere above, you've confused Hoon's tall form by using the
wrong fanout for a rune. For example,
a function call whose sample is a cell) has three subhoons:
%+ foo bar baz
But if you make a mistake and write
%+ foo bar
the parser will eat the next hoon below and try to treat it as a
part of the
%+. This can cause a cascading error somewhere
below, usually stopped by a
When this happens, don't panic! Binary search actually works
quite well. Any hoon can be stubbed out as
!!. Find the
prefix of your file that compiles, then work forward until
the actual error appears.
Now your code parses but doesn't compile.
Turn on debugging
Your first step should be to put a
!: ("zapcol") rune at the
top of the file. This is like calling the C compiler with
it tells the Hoon compiler to generate tracing hoons.
Bear in mind that
!: breaks tail-call optimization. This is a
bug, but a relatively low-priority bug.
!. turns off
!. are hoon-level, not file-level; you can
wrap any hoon in either.
If you have
!: on, you'll see an error trace, like
/~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[7 3].[11 21]> /~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[8 1].[11 21]> /~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[9 1].[11 21]> /~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[10 1].[11 21]> /~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[11 1].[11 21]> /~zod/home/0/gen/hello:<[11 7].[11 21]> nest-fail
The bottom of this trace is the line and column of the hoon which
failed to compile, then the cause of the error (
Hoon does not believe in inundating you with possibly irrelevant debugging information. Your first resort is always to just look at the code and try to figure out what's wrong. This practice strengthens your Hoon muscles.
(Consider the opposite extreme; imagine if you had a magic bot that always fixed your compiler errors for you. Pro: no time wasted on compiler errors. Con: you never learn Hoon.)
Moral fiber is all very well and good, but sometimes you're stumped. Couldn't the compiler help a little? These messages do mean something. Here are the three most common:
This is a type mismatch (
nest is the Hoon typechecker). It
means you tried to pound a square peg into a round hole.
What was the peg and what was the hole? Hoon doesn't tell you by
default, because moral fiber, and also because in too many cases
trivial errors lead to large intimidating dumps. However, you
can use the
~! rune (sigzap) to print the type of
any hoon in your stack trace.
For instance, you wrote
(foo bar) and got a
your code to be:
~! bar ~! +6.foo (foo bar)
You'll get the same
nest-fail, but this will show the type of
bar, then the type of the sample of the
find.foo error means limb
foo wasn't found in the subject.
In other words, "undeclared variable."
The most common subspecies of
find error is
the empty name
$ was not found. This often happens when you
use a hoon that does not produce a gate/mold, as a gate/mold. For
(foo bar) will give
foo is not actually a
These are errors caused by type inference in pattern matching.
mint-vain means this hoon is never executed.
there's a case in a
?- (wuthep) that isn't handled.
If your code crashes at runtime or overflows the stack, you'll see a stack trace that looks just like the trace above. Don't confuse runtime crashes with compilation errors, though.
If your code goes into an infinite loop, kill it with
need to be developing on the local console; otherwise, the
infinite loop will time out either too slowly or too fast). The
stack trace will show what your code was doing when interrupted.
The counterpart of
~! for runtime crashes is
~| foo (foo bar)
(foo bar) crashes, the value of
foo is printed in the
stack trace. Otherwise, the
~| has no effect.
The worst possibility, of course, is that your code runs but does the wrong thing. This is relatively unusual in a typed functional language, but it still happens.
~& (sigpam) is Hoon's debugging printf.
This pretty-prints its argument:
~& foo (foo bar)
will always print
foo every time it executes. A variant is
~? (sigwut), which prints only if a condition is
~? =(37 (lent foo)) foo (foo bar)
For now, you need to be on the local console to see these debug printfs (which are implemented by interpreter hints). This is a bug and, like all bugs, will be fixed at some point.